RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index

PURPOSE: To examine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the
20-item version and the Rasch-refined 15-item version of the Upper Extremity
Functional Index (UEFI-20 and UEFI-15, respectively) and to determine the impact
of arm dominance on the positive minimal clinically important difference (pMCID).
METHODS: Adults with upper-extremity (UE) dysfunction completed the UEFI-20,
Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), Pain Limitation Scale, and Pain
Intensity Scale at their initial physiotherapy assessment (Time 1); 24-48 hours
later (Time 2); and 3 weeks into treatment or at discharge, whichever came first
(Time 3). Demographics, including working status, were obtained at Time 1. Global
ratings of change (GRC) were provided by the treating physiotherapist and patient
at Time 3. The UEFI-15 was calculated from relevant items in the UEFI-20. The
intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC)
quantified test-retest reliability (Time 1-Time 2). Cross-sectional convergent
validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between Time 1 measures
of function and pain. Known-groups validity was evaluated with a one-way ANOVA
across three levels of working status. Longitudinal validity was determined by
the association (Pearson's r) between function and pain change scores (Time
1-Time 3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves estimated the pMCID
using Time 1-Time 3 change scores and average patient/therapist GRC. RESULTS:
Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both
measures). MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15.
Cross-sectional, known-groups, and longitudinal validity were confirmed for both
UEFI measures. pMCID values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the
UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Both UEFI measures show acceptable reliability and validity. Arm
dominance affects pMCID. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one
dimension: UE function.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0