Article

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in a pilot study the usefulness of measures of health and psychosocial status for use with young people with physical and complex disability. Also to test empirically a conceptual model of the factors determining key outcomes in young disabled adults, in particular, participation (handicap). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study involving face-to-face interviews with young adults aged 16-28 years (n = 45) with physical and complex disabilities. A group of nondisabled college students completed the same set of questions to provide normative scores for some psychosocial measures. SETTING: Young people with physical disabilities were recruited from the area of North and North East Lincolnshire, and nondisabled young people from the Leeds area. METHODS: Standardized measures of impairment, disability and handicap, together with various psychosocial scales were incorporated into a structured face-to-face interview. Standardized measures included the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Barthel Index, the London Handicap Scale, Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale and the Proactive Scale. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed the most important predictors of participation were energy and pain (NHP), disability (Barthel) and self-efficacy. Most of the health status measures were able to discriminate between disabled and nondisabled young people, but some measures lacked face validity for the 'nonwalking' disabled group. CONCLUSIONS: Both health status and psychosocial factors were found to impact on the participation of young people. Impairment and disability however, did not impact adversely on self-ratings of health or quality of life and it is clear from these results that having a disability may limit participation, but is not necessarily synonymous with a poorer quality of life.......

Langue : ANGLAIS

Identifiant basis : 2001218237