RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Reliability of ankle isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic strength and power testing in older women

WEBBER SC; PORTER MM
PHYS THER , 2010, vol. 90, n° 8, p. 1165-1175
Doc n°: 147804
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090394
Descripteurs : DE72 - EXPLORATION EXAMENS BILANS - CHEVILLE

Ankle strength (force-generating capacity) and power (work produced
per unit of time or product of strength and speed) capabilities influence
physical function (eg, walking, balance) in older adults.
Although strength and
power parameters frequently are measured with dynamometers, few studies have
examined the reliability of measurements of different types of contractions.
The purpose of this study was to examine relative and absolute
intrarater reliability of isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic ankle measures in
older women. DESIGN: This was a prospective, descriptive methodological study.
METHODS: The following dorsiflexion (DF) and plantar-flexion (PF) measures were
assessed twice (7 days apart) by the same examiner in 30 older women (mean
age=73.3 years, SD=4.7): isometric peak torque and rate of torque development
(RTD), isotonic peak velocity, average acceleration and peak power, and
isokinetic peak torque and peak power (30 degrees/s and 90 degrees/s). Several
statistical methods were used to examine relative and absolute reliability.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the DF tests
(ICC=.76-.97) were generally higher than ICCs for matched PF tests (ICC=.58-.93).
Measures of absolute reliability (eg, coefficient of variation of the typical
error [CV(TE)]) also demonstrated more reliable values for DF tests (5%-18%)
compared with PF tests (7%-37%). Isotonic peak velocity tests at minimal loads
were associated with the lowest CV(TE) and ratio limits of agreement values for
both DF (5% and 14%, respectively) and PF (7% and 18%, respectively). Isometric
RTD variables were the least reliable (CV(TE)=16%-37%). LIMITATIONS: This study
was limited to a relatively homogeneous sample of older women. CONCLUSIONS:
Test-retest reliability was adequate for determining changes at the group level
for all strength and power variables except isometric RTD. Minimal detectable
change scores were determined to assist clinicians in assessing meaningful change
over time in ankle strength and power measurements within individuals.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0