RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O

-A +A

Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a
framework to examine the association between falls and clinical assessment tools in people with stroke

BENINATO M; PORTNEY LG; SULLIVAN PE
PHYS THER , 2009, vol. 89, n° 8, p. 816-825
Doc n°: 143026
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://www.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080160
Descripteurs : AF21 - ACCIDENTS VASCULAIRES CEREBRAUX, DF15 -SIT-TO-STAND, JQ - CIF

Falls in people with stroke are extremely common and present a
significant health risk to this population. Development of fall screening tools
is an essential component of a comprehensive fall reduction plan. OBJECTIVE: The
purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of clinical measures
representing various domains of the International Classification of Functioning,
Disability and Health (ICF) relative to their ability to identify individuals
with a history of multiple falls. DESIGN: A case series study design was used.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a community setting. PARTICIPANTS:
Twenty-seven people with stroke participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical
assessment tools included the lower-extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer
Assessment of Sensorimotor Impairment (FMLE) and Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test
(STS) representing the body function domain, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
representing the activity domain, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence
(ABC) Scale as a measure of personal factors, and the physical function subscale
of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) as a broad measure of physical function. We
used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to generate cutoff scores,
sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LRs) relative to a history
of multiple falls. RESULTS: The FMLE and the STS showed a weak association with
fall history. The BBS demonstrated fair accuracy in identifying people with
multiple falls, with a cutoff score of 49 and a positive LR of 2.80. The ABC
Scale and the SIS-16 were most effective, with cutoff scores of 81.1 and 61.7,
respectively, positive LRs of 3.60 and 7.00, respectively, and negative LRs of
0.00 and 0.25, respectively. Limitations: A limitation of the study was the small
sample size. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the ICF is a useful framework
for selecting clinical measures relative to fall history and support the need for
prospective study of tools in more-complex domains of the ICF for their accuracy
for fall prediction in people with stroke.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0