RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Ultrasound imaging distinguishes between normal and weak muscle

CHIFISHMAN G; HICKS J; CINTAS HM
ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL , 2004, vol. 85, n° 6, p. 980-986
Doc n°: 114133
Localisation : Documentation IRR
Descripteurs : KA912 - VIBROTHERAPIE, AB1 - ETUDES GENERALES - MUSCLES
Article consultable sur : http://www.archives-pmr.org

Objective: To determine whether real-tine ultrasound imaging can provide quantitative data that distinguish pathologic from healthy muscle and that correlate with strength measures. Design: Nonrandomized matched-pair, repeated-measures design. Setting: Ultrasound imaging laboratory, rehabilitation medicine department, government research hospital. Participants: Nine patients with stable active or inactive myositis, stratified into 3 groups based on their 10-point manual muscle test (MMT) scores, and 9 age- and gender-matched controls. Interventions: Maximal isometric contraction of the rectus femoris muscle in 2 knee-flexion positions (60, 90) during simultaneous ultrasound imaging and muscle force dynamometry. Main Outcomes Measures: Changes of the rectus femoris muscle in horizontal (X) and vertical (Y) diameters between relaxed and contracted states, and muscle force measurements. Results: The X diameters decreased and the Y diameters increased during isometric contraction in all participants. For each group, average changes in cross-sectional diameters were consistently higher in controls than in patients. Patients with MMT less than 8 differed significantly from controls in both X and Y dimensions. A moderately strong correlation was found between muscle force and the Y diameter during contraction at 60degrees (r=.78) and 90degrees (r=.67) knee-flexion angles. Conclusions: Ultrasonography provided a quantitative measure of change between relaxed and contracted state of muscle, which correlated with muscle force. Ultrasound identified significant differences in cross-sectional diameters between the myopathic and normal muscles sampled and may be useful for measuring muscle response to drug and exercise therapy. (C) 2004 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0