RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users

LINDQUIST NJ; LOUDON PE; MAGIS TF; RISPIN JE; KIRBY RL; MANNS PJ
ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL , 2010, vol. 91, n° 11, p. 1752-1757
Doc n°: 148680
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.226
Descripteurs : KF62 - FAUTEUIL MANUEL
Article consultable sur : http://www.archives-pmr.org

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of
the total performance and safety scores of the Wheelchair Skills Test version 4.1
(WST 4.1) for manual wheelchairs operated by adult wheelchair users. DESIGN:
Cohort study. SETTING: University research setting. PARTICIPANTS: People (N=11)
who used manual wheelchairs for community locomotion. INTERVENTIONS: Not
applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants were videotaped as they completed
the WST 4.1 (30 skills) on 2 separate occasions 1 to 2 weeks apart. Subsequently,
raters scored the WST 4.1 from the video recordings and each participant received
a total score for performance and safety. Using those scores, interrater,
intrarater, and test-retest reliability were determined by using intraclass
correlation coefficients (ICCs). Percentages of agreement between raters for
individual skills also were calculated. RESULTS:
Mean +/- SD overall WST 4.1
scores for performance and safety were 80.1%+/-8.5% and 98.0%+/-2.8%. ICCs for
the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the performance
component were .855, .950, and .901 (P<.001). Safety component ICC scores were
.061 (P=.243), .228 (P=.048), and .254 (P=.041). Percentages of agreement between
raters for each test item for both the performance and safety scales ranged from 68% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the performance component of the WST 4.1
was excellent, whereas ICCs for the safety component indicated only slight to
fair agreement, probably because of the low variability in safety scores.
Additional study is needed to further evaluate the reliability of the safety
component with a larger and more diverse sample group.
CI - Copyright (c) 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by
Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0