RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Nonparetic arm force does not overinhibit the paretic arm in chronic poststroke hemiparesis

DIMYAN MA; PEREZ MA; AUH S; TARULA E; WILSON M; COHEN LG
ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL , 2014, vol. 95, n° 5, p. 849-856
Doc n°: 170139
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.023
Descripteurs : AF21 - ACCIDENTS VASCULAIRES CEREBRAUX, DD55 - PATHOLOGIE - COUDE
Article consultable sur : http://www.archives-pmr.org

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nonparetic arm force overinhibits the paretic arm
in patients with chronic unilateral poststroke hemiparesis. DESIGN: Case-control
neurophysiological and behavioral study of patients with chronic stroke. SETTING:
Research institution. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six referred patients were screened to
enroll 9 participants (N=9) with a >6 month history of 1 unilateral ischemic
infarct that resulted in arm hemiparesis with residual ability to produce 1Nm of
wrist flexion torque and without contraindication to transcranial magnetic
stimulation. Eight age- and handedness-matched healthy volunteers without
neurologic diagnosis were studied for comparison. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in interhemispheric inhibition targeting the
ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) during nonparetic arm force. We
hypothesized that interhemispheric inhibition would increase more in healthy
controls than in patients with hemiparesis. RESULTS: Healthy age-matched controls
had significantly greater increases in inhibition from their active to resting M1
than patients with stroke from their active contralesional to resting
ipsilesional M1 in the same scenario (20%+/-7% vs -1%+/-4%, F1,12=6.61, P=.025).
Patients with greater increases in contralesional to ipsilesional inhibition were
better performers on the 9-hole peg test of paretic arm function. CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings reveal that producing force with the nonparetic arm does not
necessarily overinhibit the paretic arm. Though our study is limited in
generalizability by the small sample size, we found that greater active
contralesional to resting ipsilesional M1 inhibition was related with better
recovery in this subset of patients with chronic poststroke.
CI - Copyright (c) 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by
Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0