RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Occupational Therapists' Opinions of Two Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement
Therapy Protocols

CHRISTMAN E; MCALLISTER K; CLAAR K; KAUFMAN S; PAGE SJ
AM J OCCUP THER , 2015, vol. 69, n° 6, p. 1-7
Doc n°: 176081
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.5014/ajot.2015.019042
Descripteurs : AJ23 - PARALYSIE CEREBRALE

We sought to determine occupational therapists' opinions of two
pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (pCIMT) protocols. METHOD: A total
of 272 therapists in pediatric rehabilitation clinics completed an electronic
survey to determine their opinions of two published pCIMT protocols. In Protocol
A, restraint is worn 24 hr/day on the nonparetic upper extremity (UE), and
in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 7 days/wk for 6 hr/day
over 3 wk. In Protocol B, restraint is worn 2 hr/day on the nonparetic UE, and
in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 1 day/wk for 2 hr/day
over 8 wk. RESULTS: The majority of participants reported moderate to high
concerns about every facet of Protocol A. Conversely, >50% of participants
reported low or no concerns about five of seven facets of Protocol B. CONCLUSION:
This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that therapists strongly
prefer low-duration pCIMT protocols.
CI - Copyright (c) 2015 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0