Article

OBJECTIVE: To determine the types and effectiveness of interventions to increase
the knowledge about, attitudes towards, and use of standardized outcome measures
in rehabilitation professionals. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search using
Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Ergonomics Abstracts, Sports Discus. The
search is current to February 2016. STUDY SELECTION:
All study designs testing
interventions were included as were all provider and patient types. Two reviewers
independently conducted a title and abstract review, followed by a full-text
review. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted a priori variables
and used consensus for disagreements. Quality assessment was conducted using the
Assessment of Quantitative Studies published by the Effective Public Health
Practice Group. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 11 studies involving at least 1200
providers. Nine of the studies showed improvements in outcome measure use rates
but only three of these studies used an experimental or quasi-experimental
design. Eight of the studies used an educational approach in the intervention and
three used audit and feedback. Poor intervention description and quality of
studies limited recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Increased attention to testing
interventions focused on known barriers, matched to behavior change techniques,
and with stronger designs is warranted.

Langue : ANGLAIS