RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and motor recovery after stroke = Neuromodulation corticale non invasive (NIBS) et récupération motrice post-AVC

SIMONETTA MOREAU M
ANN PHYS REHABIL MED , 2014, vol. 57, n° 8, p. 530-542
Doc n°: 171278
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.003
Descripteurs : AF21 - ACCIDENTS VASCULAIRES CEREBRAUX, AD3 - MOTRICITE, AL - NEUROREEDUCATION

Recovery of motor function after stroke occurs largely on the basis of a
sustained capacity of the adult brain for plastic changes.
This brain plasticity
has been validated by functional imaging and electrophysiological studies.
Various concepts of how to enhance beneficial plasticity and in turn improve
functional recovery are emerging based on the concept of functional
interhemispheric balance between the two motor cortices. Besides conventional
rehabilitation interventions and the most recent neuropharmacological approaches,
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has recently been proposed as an add-on
method to promote motor function recovery after stroke. Several methods can be
used based either on transcranial magnetic stimulation (repetitive mode: rTMS,
TBS) via a coil, or small electric current via larges electrodes placed on the
scalp, (transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS). Depending on the different
electrophysiological parameters of stimulation used, NIBS can induce a transient
modulation of the excitability of the stimulated motor cortex (facilitation or
inhibition) via a probable LTP-LTD-like mechanism. Several small studies have
shown feasible and positive treatment effects for most of these strategies and
their potential clinical relevance to help restoring the disruption of
interhemispheric imbalance after stroke. Results of these studies are encouraging
but many questions remain unsolved: what are the optimal stimulation parameters?
What is the best NIBS intervention? Which cortex, injured or intact, should be
stimulated? What is the best window of intervention? Is there a special subgroup
of stroke patients who could strongly benefit from these interventions? Finally
is it possible to boost NIBS treatment effect by motor training of the paretic
hand or by additional neuropharmacological interventions? There is clearly a need
for large-scale, controlled, multicenter trials to answer these questions before
proposing their routine use in the management of stroke patients.
CI - Copyright (c) 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Langue : ANGLAIS ; FRANCAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0