Article

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in function, performance, and preference between mechanical and microprocessor prosthetic knee control technologies. DESIGN: A-B-A-B reversal design. SETTING: Home, community, and laboratory environments. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one unilateral, transfemoral amputees. INTERVENTION: Mechanical control prosthetic knee versus microprocessor control prosthetic knee (Otto Bock C-Leg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stair rating, hill rating and time, obstacle course time, divided attention task accuracy and time, Amputee Mobility Predictor score, step activity, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire score, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score, self-reported frequency of stumbles and falls, and self-reported concentration required for ambulation. RESULTS: Stair descent score, hill descent time, and hill sound-side step length showed significant (P<.01) improvement with the C-Leg. Users reported a significant (P<.05) decrease in frequency of stumbles and falls, frustration with falling, and difficulty in multitasking while using the microprocessor knee. Subject satisfaction with the C-Leg was significantly (P<.001) greater than the mechanical control prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The study population showed improved performance when negotiating stairs and hills, reduced frequency of stumbling and falling, and a preference for the microprocessor control C-Leg as compared with the mechanical control prosthetic knee.

Langue : ANGLAIS