RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

A randomized controlled trial on the effects of cycling with and without electrical stimulation on cardiorespiratory and vascular health in children with spinal cord injury

JOHNSTON TE; SMITH BT; MULCAHEY MJ; BETZ RR; LAUER RT
ARCH PHYS MED REHABIL , 2009, vol. 90, n° 8, p. 1379-1388
Doc n°: 144548
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.018
Descripteurs : AE21 - ORIGINE TRAUMATIQUE, KA64 - NEMS, FA1 - GENERALITES - COEUR
Article consultable sur : http://www.archives-pmr.org

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cardiorespiratory/vascular effects of cycling with and
without functional electrical stimulation (FES) in children with spinal cord
injury (SCI). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Pediatric referral
hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Children with SCI (N=30), ages 5 to 13 years, with injury
levels from C4 to T11, and American Spinal Injury Association grades A, B, or C.
INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: FES leg cycling
exercise, passive leg cycling, or noncycling control group receiving electrical
stimulation therapy. After receiving instruction on the use of the equipment,
children exercised for 1 hour 3 times per week for 6 months at home with parental
supervision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) during an incremental
arm ergometry test, resting heart rate, forced vital capacity, and a fasting
lipid profile. RESULTS: There were no differences (P>.05) between groups after 6
months of exercise when comparing pre- and postvalues. However, there were
differences between groups for some variables when examining percent change. The
FES cycling group showed an improvement (P=.035) in Vo(2) (16.2%+/-25.0%) as
compared with the passive cycling group (-28.7%+/-29.1%). For lipid levels, the
electrical stimulation-only group showed declines (P=.032) in cholesterol levels
(-17.1%+/-8.5%) as compared with the FES cycling group (4.4%+/-20.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cycling with FES led to gains in Vo(2), whereas electrical
stimulation alone led to improvements in cholesterol.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0