RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction for patients with knee osteoarthritis

ALPAYCI M; OZKAN Y; YAZMALAR L; HIZ O; EDIZ L
CLIN REHABIL , 2013, vol. 27, n° 4, p. 347-354
Doc n°: 162340
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1177/0269215512459062
Descripteurs : DE553 - GONARTHROSE

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction in
the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Design:
A randomized, controlled,
observer-blind seven-week trial. Setting:
Hospital-based outpatient practice.
Subjects: Ninety-eight patients with stage 3 knee osteoarthritis according to
Kellgren-Lawrence radiological rating scale. Interventions: All 98 patients were
randomly assigned to three treatment groups, for three weeks (weekends excluded).
The control group (n=30, mean age: 59.30+/-8.16) received hot pack and short wave
diathermy; the intermittent group (n=30, mean age: 58.20+/-7.78) received hot
pack, short wave diathermy and intermittent traction; and the continuous group
(n=30, mean age: 57.97+/-9.53) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and
continuous traction. Outcome measurements: The values of the Turkish version of
the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC),
visual analog scale, and knee passive range of motion were measured at baseline,
three-week and seven-week follow-up. Results: Compared with baseline at weeks 3
and 7, all the outcome measures, except range of motion, were significantly
reduced in all groups (all P</=0.001). In terms of the change data from baseline
to week 3, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the
WOMAC physical function scores. Considering the change data from baseline to week
7, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the pain
scores, physical function and total scores, while only the continuous group was
significantly better than the control in the stiffness scores (control: 1.17 +/-
1.64; continuous: 2.38 +/- 1.44) (P=0.014). Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and
7, range of motion values significantly increased in both traction groups
(P<0.05) but not in the control (P>0.05). However, there were
no significant
differences among the three groups considering the change data from baseline to
week 7 in range of motion values (P=0.300). Conclusions: Joint traction was found
to be beneficial for the improvement of pain and physical function loss related
to knee osteoarthritis.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0